Pros and cons of collegiality and annuity
With an official structure based on the principles of collegiality and annuity, it was possible in the Roman Empire partly more efficient and fairer, but partly less effective and demoralizing become. You can find out here what advantages and disadvantages such an exercise of office entailed.
In the Roman Empire, people lived and ruled according to the principles of “collegiality” and “annuity”. Collegiality means that each magistrate's office is occupied by at least two colleagues with equal rights. With the stipulation of the annuity, the term of office was limited to one year. Now learn the pros and cons of these two principles.
Benefits of collegiality and annuity
With an office structure based on collegiality and annuity, a number of advantages could be achieved that significantly improved working together and goal-oriented work.
- By distributing it to several colleagues with equal rights, an excessive amount of power for a single person could be avoided, so that theoretically could not come to a kind of tyranny or dictatorship and a kind of democracy with a consideration of pluralistic opinion was implemented.
- In addition, it could be achieved that an incumbent controlled by the other incumbents and they also had a right of objection, so that errors or abuse of office are minimized could.
- The risk of abuse of office could also be reduced with the principle of annuity, since everyone Incumbents had to give an account of themselves after one year and could also be prosecuted if they abused their office could.
- Due to the short term of office, there were also more opportunities for advancement or promotion. the opportunity to hold high office, which increased ambition and thus morale and the quality of work.
From today's perspective, Otto von Bismarck is one of the most brilliant and at the same time most controversial ...
Disadvantages of such an office distribution
Although both principles have some advantages, there are also some disadvantages.
- First of all, there was the great danger that colleagues would block each other with their different ideas and opinions which on the one hand led to lengthy discussions and delays and on the other hand to an unfriendly atmosphere and frustration led.
- The disadvantages also include the fact that continuity could hardly be achieved. Due to the constant change of office, it was in principle impossible to have a uniform over a longer period of time politics to operate.
- Also, due to the frequent changes, the term of office was - in relative terms - significantly shortened, since the new incumbents always had to be retrained and instructed, which is not so important with a longer term of office would.
- Recently, it has also happened that the relatively short term of office of one year is not long enough to successfully and meaningfully implement a lengthy project. Due to the time pressure, it was therefore possible that projects were not implemented at all or only in a reduced form.
