How do I write a review?
There are many articles and books. Meetings are ideal for this. Those who want to write it should, however, rely on the scientific framework for the review and not pursue subjective opinion.
How to write content reviews
There is a clear structure to be followed when writing a review.
- At the beginning, the content of the material should be given. You should provide this as a kind of overview of the text. It is advisable to keep to a small extent. After all, you don't want to just deliver a duplicate.
- This also includes comments on the type of text and formal information such as naming the author and the chronological order.
- Then you have to try to create a connection. This contextualization represents a historical or scientific reference.
- You should include the continuation of existing texts or the reference as a counter thesis to an already existing text in detail.
- Statements about the opening discussion rounds or the theoretical orientation of the content lead some content-related points to the daylight.
- At the end, write your opinion on the text.
How do you write a review? - Instructions
Many are faced with an almost impossible task when a review is written ...
Your noted opinion as the quintessence of the review
Some believe that they are writing a review. Meanwhile, his text is only an image of the content. When discussing a scientific or literary text, your own statement is essential.
- When writing a review, avoid hostile moves towards the author.
- The statement does not include any subjective references to a topic. Your opinion thus relates to the content and not to the author's tendency on the subject.
- You should examine the way it is displayed. Also point out false conclusions.
- Check the answers to the text. Have you answered the questions related to the topic with him?
- Check the consistency of the text. In addition to the central theme, this also includes credibility.
- Criticize conflicting facts.
- At your meeting, sample the further development of the topic. You need to be presented with clear facts that will enrich the relevant debate. Duplicate texts, in other words, should be scrutinized.
The thought of an echo - now someone is writing a review about it - comes up quickly with some texts. But such a discussion is far from mere evaluation.
How helpful do you find this article?
