Start sentence with "for"

The word 'for' is a connective word, which means that it usually connects two sentences. As a result, it is not strictly appropriate for you to begin a sentence with this word.

Form a sentence with 'for'

• The word 'for' usually introduces a subordinate clause, which is why it is also known as a connective word. It connects two sentences together. This can be, for example, a more detailed description of a statement.
• For example, you can make a statement about the weather: "The weather is good." To justify why you think the weather is good, you can add a sub-structure to this statement add to. So you can say: "The weather is good because it doesn't rain."
• Everyone then understands your statement, which of course lies in your subjective assessment of the situation. The secondary structure is introduced by the connective word 'then' and separated from the main statement with a comma.

Start sentences with connecting words

• Connected sentences are usually formed in the manner described above. The fact that you start sentences with connecting words is rather the exception. One reason, for example, is that it doesn't look particularly good. Especially if you work as a copywriter, author or journalist, this question of style can decide whether or not to receive an order.


Coordinating conjunctions

If you studied parts of speech in school, conjunctions ...

• As always, exceptions are the rule. For example, it can make sense to start sentences with connecting words if the actual sentence would otherwise be too long or if the meaning of it would no longer be clearly recognizable.
• For example, if you say, "I never intended to sell my dog, I wanted to let him go, even if it hurt to say goodbye. Because, in my opinion, animals should be allowed to live freely. "Then you already have a very long sentence that also contains subordinate clauses. In that case, another sub-structure could cause confusion. It is better to start a new sentence with a connective word.

If you want to start a sentence with 'for', just consider whether adding a secondary structure would not fit better. I wish you success!