Write the discussion using the ping-pong principle
When writing a discussion, there are several strategies you can use to support your own positions and arguments. The so-called ping-pong principle has a particularly lively effect, but when using it you should pay attention to various things.
What is the ping pong principle?
When structuring a discussion one can proceed either in a linear or in a dialectical way. The ping-pong principle is a dialectical approach that can be understood as follows.
- Dialectical means that when writing a discussion using the ping-pong principle, two fundamentally different points of view or lines of argument are juxtaposed.
- The ping-pong principle differs from the so-called hourglass principle in that you have the Pro and one con arguments are not divided into two blocks, but alternate between them presents.
- The ping-pong principle is similar to a real dialogue, in which speech and counter-speech alternate, which gives the discussion a very lively character.
How to structure the discussion properly
The main difficulty in writing a discussion using the ping-pong principle is always to find suitable transitions from one argument to the next. It works best if you follow these steps.
Outline: linear discussion - informative
A discussion is a special form of essay. In contrast to …
- First write down on a separate piece of paper in note form and in any order the arguments of the opposing position and look for your own arguments to support them invalidate.
- Then put the individual sections of the argument in such an order that your strongest argument emerges last in the discussion and thus the most lasting impression leaves behind.
- Then you only need the individual opposing positions together with your arguments to invalidate them in formulate the worked out order in order to ensure a well-structured discussion based on the ping-pong principle obtain.
How helpful do you find this article?
